384 pp., 61/8 x 91/4, 17 illus., notes, bibl., index
Native Intellectuals and the Politics of Historiography, 1827-1863
In the early years of the republic, the United States government negotiated with Indian nations because it could not afford protracted wars politically, militarily, or economically. Maureen Konkle argues that by depending on treaties, which rest on the equal standing of all signatories, Europeans in North America institutionalized a paradox: the very documents through which they sought to dispossess Native peoples in fact conceded Native autonomy.
As the United States used coerced treaties to remove Native peoples from their lands, a group of Cherokee, Pequot, Ojibwe, Tuscarora, and Seneca writers spoke out. With history, polemic, and personal narrative these writers countered widespread misrepresentations about Native peoples' supposedly primitive nature, their inherent inability to form governments, and their impending disappearance. Furthermore, they contended that arguments about racial difference merely justified oppression and dispossession; deriding these arguments as willful attempts to evade the true meanings and implications of the treaties, the writers insisted on recognition of Native peoples' political autonomy and human equality. Konkle demonstrates that these struggles over the meaning of U.S.-Native treaties in the early nineteenth century led to the emergence of the first substantial body of Native writing in English and, as she shows, the effects of the struggle over the political status of Native peoples remain embedded in contemporary scholarship.
"A much-needed volume on Native American history. . . . This book should . . . come as a clarion call to those of us who research Native American history. The concept of 'nation' is not wholly cultural—it is political, and an emphasis on the former at the expense of the latter elides vital bases for Native American political sovereignty. Writing Indian Nations serves as a much needed reminder that this remains as true today as it was in the nineteenth century."
--Western Historical Quarterly
"Konkle challenges readers to reexamine both the writing of Native intellectuals and the critical frameworks--including her own--that have guided their interpretation."
--NC Historical Review
"Konkle has produced a sterling account that seamlessly blends treaty law, literary criticism, and history into a comprehensive and detailed story about what Native writers and political leaders in the early part of the nineteenth century had to say about the pitfalls and possibilities generated when these talented individual Indians and the First Nations they were part of encountered U.S. colonialism."
--David E. Wilkins, University of Minnesota
© 2007 The University of North Carolina Press
116 South Boundary Street, Chapel Hill, NC 27514-3808
Privacy |
Make a Gift |
Environmental Policy